VossedWorld

Saturday, July 30, 2005

Vos on Scofield's "Chiliasm": Reckless Abuse of O.T. Exegesis

Vos' The Pauline Eschatology "Chiliasm (pre-millenarianism) has to its credit the astounding readiness it evinces of taking the O.T. Scriptures in a realistic manner, with simple faith, not asking whether the fulfillment of these things is even logically conceivable, offering as its sole basis the conviction that to God all things are possible. This attitude is of course, not attained except through a reckless abuse of the fundamental principles of O.T. exegesis, a perversion invading inevitably the precincts of N.T, exegesis likewise, heedless of the fact that already the O.T. itself points to the spiritualizing of most of the things in question. Apart from accidental features, and broadly speaking, Chiliasm is a daring literalizing and concretizing of the substance of ancient revelation." -- Geerhardus Vos, The Pauline Eschatology, p. 227

Note: what could be said of early 20th century chiliasm can be said of today's "literalism" in fundamentalism. One could easily switch "chiliasm" and "literalism" in the above quote. Literal interpretation understands the scriptures as literally true. Literalism understands the scriptures as truly literal. Vos goes on to suggest that Christ as the fulfillment of the Old Testament precludes the latter.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Mike said...

Mike on Vos's Allegoricalism:

Allegorical interpretation of the plain declarations of the Old Testament has the advantage of meaning whatever the interpreter wants. Therefore making the plain statements of the Old Testament and New devoid of any concrete reliable meaning. Instead of adjusting one's "logic" to the plain statements of the Scriptures, the Scriptures are made to adjust to whatever "logic" the interpreter wishes to superimpose on them. Meaning must arise from the text, not from the system of the interpreter. Premillenialism is much more consistent with the meaning that arises from the text.

5:21 PM, March 28, 2006  
Blogger Breuss Wane said...

You are right about allegory, but Vos was not an advocate of allegory.

His Biblical Theology was driven by the text, not the other way around.

5:40 PM, March 28, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home